Saturday, June 30, 2007

Glenn Greenwald, Tucker, Jonah, Elizabeth and Jillian, Salon.com, 29 June 2007.

Greenwald observes additional instances of Authoritarian Follower behaviour in the American media. In order to understand how the Bush administration has been allowed to continue its series of reckless constitution breaking activities over the last 6 years you must learn more about the psychology of Authoritarianism. Read:

Bob Altemeyer, The Authoritarians, 2007.

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Bob Woodward.
State of Denial: Bush at War, Part III.
New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006.

Book information: publisher, Amazon.com.

Whereas Thomas Ricks' Fiasco gives a picture of the Iraq quagmire via the failures of the military leadership and their interactions with the civilian leadership, Woodward focuses on the senior political and civilian leadership in Washington. Together these two books give insightful views on the multifaceted Iraq quagmire from different angles. In addition to Woodward's main focus on Iraq-related decision making, his book documents the more general problem of Execute Branch dysfunction. That is, neither the individuals involved (i.e., Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, etc.) nor the organizational structures (i.e., Departments of Defense and State, National Security Council, etc., "the interagency") of the Executive Branch are capable of managing the challenges of the Iraq undertaking. Danner's review explains this well:

Woodward tends to blame "the broken policy process" on the relative strength of personalities gathered around the cabinet table: the power and ruthlessness of Rumsfeld, the legendary "bureaucratic infighter"; the weakness of Rice, the very function and purpose of whose job, to let the President both benefit from and control the bureaucracy, was in effect eviscerated. Suskind [ The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11 ] , more convincingly, argues that Bush and Cheney constructed precisely the government they wanted: centralized, highly secretive, its clean, direct lines of decision unencumbered by information or consultation. "There was never any policy process to break, by Condi or anyone else," Richard Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state, remarks to Suskind. "There was never one from the start. Bush didn't want one, for whatever reason." (Danner, NYRB.)

Some book reviews:
Other Links:

Saturday, June 02, 2007

"Verschärfte Vernehmung"

"Enhanced Interrogation" was recognized as a war crime when practiced by Germans in the 1930s and 1940s; now it's official U.S. government policy.

Andrew Sullivan, "Verschärfte Vernehmung", The Daily Dish, The Atlantic Online, 29 May 2007.

Glenn Greenwald, Al-Qaida does it, too, Unclaimed Territory, Salon.com, 01 June 2007.